<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joe's Amazing Technicolor Weblog &#187; scm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slagwerks.com/blog/index.php/tag/scm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slagwerks.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is there any reason for subversion users not to be using svk?</title>
		<link>http://slagwerks.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/26/is-there-any-reason-for-subversion-users-not-to-be-using-svk/</link>
		<comments>http://slagwerks.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/26/is-there-any-reason-for-subversion-users-not-to-be-using-svk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slagwerks.com/blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After taking svk out for a spin this week, I&#8217;m having trouble thinking of any, beyond &#8220;it&#8217;s too hard to install because I don&#8217;t use a debian-based OS&#8221;. Not to say that there aren&#8217;t other OSes that it installs on easily, but I&#8217;ve only tried it on Ubuntu, which if course required only sudo apt-get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After taking <a href="http://svk.bestpractical.com/view/HomePage">svk</a> out for a spin this week, I&#8217;m having trouble thinking of any, beyond &#8220;it&#8217;s too hard to install because I don&#8217;t use a debian-based <span class="caps">OS</span>&#8221;. Not to say that there aren&#8217;t other OSes that it installs on easily, but I&#8217;ve only tried it on Ubuntu, which if course required only <code>sudo apt-get install svk</code>.<br />
svk has some serious&nbsp;bennies:</p>
<ul>
<li>no more .svn files littered throughout working&nbsp;directories!</li>
<li>we can keep committing away even when the svn server or network connection goes down, and then push all those commits to the server when things are working&nbsp;again.</li>
<li>smarter merging (I think; haven&#8217;t spent much time with it&nbsp;yet)</li>
<li>almost nothing to learn; for normal commands, just type <code>svk</code> instead of&nbsp;<code>svn</code>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Not to say that all is perfect; the docs are a little thin <span class="amp">&amp;</span> scattered. The most comprehensive seems to be the <a href="http://svkbook.elixus.org/">online book</a> which is cribbed from subversion&#8217;s - in fact, a number of places in the book still read &#8220;subversion this <span class="amp">&amp;</span> that&#8221; instead of &#8220;svk this and&nbsp;that&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://slagwerks.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/26/is-there-any-reason-for-subversion-users-not-to-be-using-svk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
